![[info]](http://p-stat.livejournal.com/img/userinfo.gif){kind=small}
| I | Influential |
| D | Delicious |
| E | Exhausting |
| A | Amorous |
| T | Talented |
| I | Important |
| O | Organic |
| N | Nutty |
| B | Boisterous |
| A | Astonishing |
| B | Brilliant |
| Y | Yummy |
Name Acronym Generator
From Go-Quiz.com
May 6th, 2007
Name Acronym Generator
From Go-Quiz.com
May 3rd, 2007
Carbon Credits on the Election Train...
gspSo these are my thoughts upon reading about Kennedy and Fitzgerald and Carbon Credits:
I was always fascinated by the FDR train to election, and let's face it: Trains are Rad.
And very efficient.
Capitalism is the wagon in which we ride to such measure of happiness as it is possible to humanly achieve. It has been a reasonabley good vehicle for several hundred years, and even then there are barefoot doctors, etc... And Trains run through the country and sometimes have to stop in ho-bunk town and yes, you can can have parties on them. We must repair them - replace worn parts and have a good old time with them.
A real heast would be if the whole Iraq war isn't actually happening, but rather we are investing in commodities, and in fact, Gore IS president and we are ALL being deceived - too bad it's not true. We know that individual liberty and happi8ness mean nothing unless both are ordered in the sense that one man's meat is not another man's poisen.... We know that the liberty to do anything which deprives others of their rights is outside the protection of any compact and that government in this regard is the maintenance of aq balance within which every individual may have a place if he will take it.
Liberia has a female president but is a mess. Let's have fun this time around and also deal with all the ill effects.... we have the WILL POWER ( just ask Will Bundy) so now let's do more... with "time never stopped" this time around int he future.
Did I mention I'm looking for some sort of creative job?
THANKS ALL!
Oh yea, it's wierd to me that in Cambodia I can't find a scrap yard, but in the US we can't find an empty one!
Carry on....
I was always fascinated by the FDR train to election, and let's face it: Trains are Rad.
And very efficient.
Capitalism is the wagon in which we ride to such measure of happiness as it is possible to humanly achieve. It has been a reasonabley good vehicle for several hundred years, and even then there are barefoot doctors, etc... And Trains run through the country and sometimes have to stop in ho-bunk town and yes, you can can have parties on them. We must repair them - replace worn parts and have a good old time with them.
A real heast would be if the whole Iraq war isn't actually happening, but rather we are investing in commodities, and in fact, Gore IS president and we are ALL being deceived - too bad it's not true. We know that individual liberty and happi8ness mean nothing unless both are ordered in the sense that one man's meat is not another man's poisen.... We know that the liberty to do anything which deprives others of their rights is outside the protection of any compact and that government in this regard is the maintenance of aq balance within which every individual may have a place if he will take it.
Liberia has a female president but is a mess. Let's have fun this time around and also deal with all the ill effects.... we have the WILL POWER ( just ask Will Bundy) so now let's do more... with "time never stopped" this time around int he future.
Did I mention I'm looking for some sort of creative job?
THANKS ALL!
Oh yea, it's wierd to me that in Cambodia I can't find a scrap yard, but in the US we can't find an empty one!
Carry on....
May 2nd, 2007
Oh yea, and by the way....
The Japanese - talk about the sun also rising... are hot on the trail of Cold Fusion...
Tesla if you can it, has a free energy system that some Aussies pray t but where is it is a great question... word is... maybe both might work which will be great for trains, etc....
Tesla if you can it, has a free energy system that some Aussies pray t but where is it is a great question... word is... maybe both might work which will be great for trains, etc....
April 16th, 2007
April 10th, 2007
Why this needs to be said publicly is a strange story...
But when you Google Harvard-Westlake, you might come up with THIS link...
http://constantpated.blogspot.com/2005/0
Take off the back-end and you have moer....
Specifics
All orders to and from Combatant Commanders to avoid enforcing the laws of war are not lawful.
All contracts, agreements, and direction from Congress to avoid enforcement of the laws of war are not lawful.
Any direction the President gives to thwart enforcement of Geneva is illegal.
Any e-mail, message, or other communication from the DNC and GOP related to blocking enforcement of the laws of war; or not implementing impeachment is illegal.
When these orders come down, your job is to question why these are consistent with the oath, the Constitution, and laws of war.
Things will be fabricated to make you react to an illusion. The goal is to get you to distract your attention from the real problem: The GOP's war crimes; and get you to focus on an illusory problem.
Compel the leadership to explain why you should believe them. The issue is their lack of credibly.
If this was "such a surprise" why did they have this memo prepared in advance of the event?
This is being orchestrated not to do the right ting, but to get you to quickly react without thinking. Challenge the leadership to explain why you should have confidence that what they are saying is real, to be believed, and why there is such an "urgency" yet they had the time to coordinate their response.
It's being orchestrated to distract attention and avoid accountability for war crimes.
Is this a Blog Sociology Event?
http://constantpated.blogspot.com/2005/0
Take off the back-end and you have moer....
Specifics
All orders to and from Combatant Commanders to avoid enforcing the laws of war are not lawful.
All contracts, agreements, and direction from Congress to avoid enforcement of the laws of war are not lawful.
Any direction the President gives to thwart enforcement of Geneva is illegal.
Any e-mail, message, or other communication from the DNC and GOP related to blocking enforcement of the laws of war; or not implementing impeachment is illegal.
When these orders come down, your job is to question why these are consistent with the oath, the Constitution, and laws of war.
Things will be fabricated to make you react to an illusion. The goal is to get you to distract your attention from the real problem: The GOP's war crimes; and get you to focus on an illusory problem.
Compel the leadership to explain why you should believe them. The issue is their lack of credibly.
If this was "such a surprise" why did they have this memo prepared in advance of the event?
This is being orchestrated not to do the right ting, but to get you to quickly react without thinking. Challenge the leadership to explain why you should have confidence that what they are saying is real, to be believed, and why there is such an "urgency" yet they had the time to coordinate their response.
It's being orchestrated to distract attention and avoid accountability for war crimes.
Is this a Blog Sociology Event?
April 9th, 2007
"Your assertion that the Commissioner was wrong cannot justify the wrong of leaving the city unguarded. That furnished the opportunity; the criminal element furnished the action. There is no right to strike against the public safety by anyone, anywhere, any time. ... I am equally determined to defend to sovereignty of Massachusetts and to maintain the authority and jurisdiction over her public officers where it has been placed by the Constitution and laws of her people."
E.T., meet Al Bundy
And HOW do you FEEL? Is this not a question for Obama?
This seems like such a simple question. However, if one looks more closely, simple it is not.
For example, let us consider that it is a culturally loaded question - people is Asia, for example, don't ask this question upon meeting up with someone again. It is almost considered invasive!
Instead, a frequent question would be: Where do you go?
For example, if you go to the dumpster to throw out damning evidence, then this is a really interesting question. Perhaps, for example, on the contrary, you are busy gathering evidence which reveals your motivation. Or perhaps you are simply trying to get the hell away from such an environment because it is dangerous. One yogi told ME: "The first rule towards living a long life is to not live in a violent place" I suppose lies could be considered a violent act. This seems to be in the news lately.
But the question I would like to consider is much more geared towards presidential hopefuls and those interested in fine-tuning political systems. People well oriented towards this type of work clearly have some personality traits that lead to success. Calvin Coolidge is not known for his great speeches.
As a leader, posturing is not essential, but it is helpful. Lincoln, however, carried his charisma proudly, and this posturing came across as natural and consistent. Wavering people are often not concerned with the issues at hand, but rather with creating a good public impression, or their own unsatisfied interests.
The question becomes more profound when you consider that, on the one hand, elected candidates often espouse a credo of adhering to their constituents, offering a wide swath of leeway to simply state "oh, well the voting public made me re-think this issue", while on the other hand, candidates are expected to rise above common morality and create leadership amongst chaos.
Another method would be to listen strictly to the research available on such matters, suspend judgment on various personality quirks, and get busy addressing the more central issues of what creates good governance. While I would postulate that charisma is a necessary ingredient, the simple, straightforward application of questions such as "how does this help YOU" might help candidates be introspective enough to rise above the glaring character deficiencies that ALL humans possess.
Consider it a type of inner 'checks and balances' system for the moral compass. What shocks ME is how few times this question is brought up in debates. OBVIOUSLY Cheney owns a huge share of Hallbutron - is it so difficult to imagine how this business helps HIM? People in debates seem so keen on talking - but what about better QUESTIONS? Like: HOW do you feel. It entails: what is it you are capable of feeling and why? Clearly Cheney asks himself this question, but he hides the answer. What an interesting thing!
Or, for a moment, let us consider the question from standing just outside a sociopaths perspective: Do you have the capacity to understand these things?
For example, if you are not a doctor, but rather a codependent that is creating a pattern of eating disorder within your family, how are you to judge someone's eating disorder? It is, in fact, part and partial of the same sickness.
None-the-less what seems simple is often the most over-looked, especially by the ignorant American public. Chalk it up to a lack of experience! Sadly, rather than create healthy extended families, we are busy dragging Mathew Sheppard behind a pick-up truck as an example to our kids. Some family members of mine think this is funny.
On an unrelated note, I am conceptualizing a school which is fashioned out of shipping containers and once again combines trade with culture. That a few corporate citizens are responsible for the distribution of goods through large corporations which are strictly function-oriented represents, to me, a tremendous waste of resources and opportunities for richer exchange.
Students would live on tankers and containers would be outfitted with important equipment. As a 'semester at sea' program it would give students a service component and international exposure. Furthermore, as the program is scaled, mixing groups based on research interests and relationship-building will undoubtedly create new nodes of information and research into educational methodologies.
This seems like such a simple question. However, if one looks more closely, simple it is not.
For example, let us consider that it is a culturally loaded question - people is Asia, for example, don't ask this question upon meeting up with someone again. It is almost considered invasive!
Instead, a frequent question would be: Where do you go?
For example, if you go to the dumpster to throw out damning evidence, then this is a really interesting question. Perhaps, for example, on the contrary, you are busy gathering evidence which reveals your motivation. Or perhaps you are simply trying to get the hell away from such an environment because it is dangerous. One yogi told ME: "The first rule towards living a long life is to not live in a violent place" I suppose lies could be considered a violent act. This seems to be in the news lately.
But the question I would like to consider is much more geared towards presidential hopefuls and those interested in fine-tuning political systems. People well oriented towards this type of work clearly have some personality traits that lead to success. Calvin Coolidge is not known for his great speeches.
As a leader, posturing is not essential, but it is helpful. Lincoln, however, carried his charisma proudly, and this posturing came across as natural and consistent. Wavering people are often not concerned with the issues at hand, but rather with creating a good public impression, or their own unsatisfied interests.
The question becomes more profound when you consider that, on the one hand, elected candidates often espouse a credo of adhering to their constituents, offering a wide swath of leeway to simply state "oh, well the voting public made me re-think this issue", while on the other hand, candidates are expected to rise above common morality and create leadership amongst chaos.
Another method would be to listen strictly to the research available on such matters, suspend judgment on various personality quirks, and get busy addressing the more central issues of what creates good governance. While I would postulate that charisma is a necessary ingredient, the simple, straightforward application of questions such as "how does this help YOU" might help candidates be introspective enough to rise above the glaring character deficiencies that ALL humans possess.
Consider it a type of inner 'checks and balances' system for the moral compass. What shocks ME is how few times this question is brought up in debates. OBVIOUSLY Cheney owns a huge share of Hallbutron - is it so difficult to imagine how this business helps HIM? People in debates seem so keen on talking - but what about better QUESTIONS? Like: HOW do you feel. It entails: what is it you are capable of feeling and why? Clearly Cheney asks himself this question, but he hides the answer. What an interesting thing!
Or, for a moment, let us consider the question from standing just outside a sociopaths perspective: Do you have the capacity to understand these things?
For example, if you are not a doctor, but rather a codependent that is creating a pattern of eating disorder within your family, how are you to judge someone's eating disorder? It is, in fact, part and partial of the same sickness.
None-the-less what seems simple is often the most over-looked, especially by the ignorant American public. Chalk it up to a lack of experience! Sadly, rather than create healthy extended families, we are busy dragging Mathew Sheppard behind a pick-up truck as an example to our kids. Some family members of mine think this is funny.
On an unrelated note, I am conceptualizing a school which is fashioned out of shipping containers and once again combines trade with culture. That a few corporate citizens are responsible for the distribution of goods through large corporations which are strictly function-oriented represents, to me, a tremendous waste of resources and opportunities for richer exchange.
Students would live on tankers and containers would be outfitted with important equipment. As a 'semester at sea' program it would give students a service component and international exposure. Furthermore, as the program is scaled, mixing groups based on research interests and relationship-building will undoubtedly create new nodes of information and research into educational methodologies.
April 8th, 2007
Oh sea! Oh sea!
By Henry David Theroux IN "PAT"
Oh sea! Oh sea!
This is the pearl of the land
Have you in the cradles of your shells a pearl to match?
The calling reminds me of one of Jalal-ud-Din Rumi's (1207-1273 A.D.) poems which translated by Coleman Barks,
"You have been a prisoner of a little pond.
I am the ocean with turbulent flood.
Come merge with me..."
Rumi portrays this, "O seeker without the shadow of a pir (teacher) the clamor of the beast will torment you." Also, Hafiz emphasis the need for a guide in the following poem,
"Do not take a step
on the path of love without a guide.
I have tried it
one hundred times and failed."
25 She can even tie the Devil to a pillow (spiteful obstinacy overpowers even the Devil himself).
26 He is a pillar-biter (a religious hypocrite).
27 She carries fire in one hand and water in the other (she is two-faced and deceitful).
28 a) To fry the whole herring for the sake of the roe ('To throw a sprat to catch a herring", that is, to sacrifice a trifle to gain something substantial).
b) His herring does not fry here (things are not going according to plan).
c) To get the lid on the head (to have to make pay for the damages; "To be left holding the bag").
29 a) He has more in him than an empty herring (many things often have a deeper significance than superficial observation would suggest; "There is more to it than meets the eye").
b) The herring hangs by its own gills (everyone must bear the consequences of his own mistakes).
30 To sit between two stools in the ashes (to miss an opportunity; to fail due to indecisiveness; 'To fall between two stools").
31 What can smoke do to iron? (It is useless to try to change the existing order).
32 The spindle falls into the ashes (the business at hand has failed).
33 To find the dog in the pot. When one lets in the dog, it will get into the larder (pot) (to have one's trouble for nothing; to come too late to prevent loss or damage)
34 Here the sow pulls out the bung (poor management; negligence will be punished).
35 He runs his head against a stone wall (to pursue the impossible recklessly and impetuously).
36 To be driven into armour (to be enraged, angered; 'To be up in arms over something").
37 To bell the cat (When one plans something which everyone finds out about, one's undertaking will turn out badly).
39 An iron-biter (a big mouth).
41 He always gnaws on one bone (endless, futile chore; or, to continually repeat everything; "To be always harping on the same string").
42 There the scissors hang out (symbol of pick-pocketing; a place of cheating and fleecing: "a clip joint").
46 Shear them but do not skin them (do not pursue your advantage at any price).
This is for the REAL American Embassy. Vermeer Verneer: I happen to think that Vermeer was a second identity of another painter, but it can't be proved - it's just so STRANGE that he seemingly came from NOWHERE...
Val Surf? Santa Cruz and O'neill Cats?
12 family members, one gay
Does anyone know what happens in Australia if you DON'T vote? You get fined!
Strangely, in Ohio, a SUPREME COURT CASE leveled that, indeed, it was LEGAL to go out and register voters and then throw out all the registrations that are for a different party.
NOW LISTEN TO THIS, ASSHOLES...
Why do people have to identify ANYWAY from the outright? Shouldn't we ALL be automatically REQUIRED to vote? I like that one, from 'the man' down under.
If we look closely at the sitation, it's easy to see double. George Sr. is wanted on War Crimes in Cambodia, yet it's ok for the Goverer of Texas to authorize, or at least be complicit (actually, he did issue a 'memo') in the execution of a retard.
Do I have to discuss why this is disturbing?
Apparently, yes. It has to do with Supreme Court Judges and the former head of the CIA, Bush Sr.
Jon Swain's book River of Time notes:
For myself, there are certain things I shall never forget: the bodies I saw being tossed about in it's violent eddies near a ferry town 32 miles south of Phnom Penh in the early morning mist when the Mekong is at its most majestic and mysterious; or the dawn tragedy of the B52 bomber of the US air force which prematurely unleashed it's cargo of high-explosives on the same little town, turning it's center into a flattened mass of rubble under which many people lay dead. 'I saw one stick of bombs through the town but it was no great disaster,' Colonel Opfer, the American air attache, told a press conference. Opfer had not understood a thing. The bombing had killed or wounded some 400 people. One man lost twelve members of his family.
Now, if THAT was on your permanent record, how would YOU handle it? Lie, Cheat, Steal? What if you paid for the whole thing?
Strangely, in Ohio, a SUPREME COURT CASE leveled that, indeed, it was LEGAL to go out and register voters and then throw out all the registrations that are for a different party.
NOW LISTEN TO THIS, ASSHOLES...
Why do people have to identify ANYWAY from the outright? Shouldn't we ALL be automatically REQUIRED to vote? I like that one, from 'the man' down under.
If we look closely at the sitation, it's easy to see double. George Sr. is wanted on War Crimes in Cambodia, yet it's ok for the Goverer of Texas to authorize, or at least be complicit (actually, he did issue a 'memo') in the execution of a retard.
Do I have to discuss why this is disturbing?
Apparently, yes. It has to do with Supreme Court Judges and the former head of the CIA, Bush Sr.
Jon Swain's book River of Time notes:
For myself, there are certain things I shall never forget: the bodies I saw being tossed about in it's violent eddies near a ferry town 32 miles south of Phnom Penh in the early morning mist when the Mekong is at its most majestic and mysterious; or the dawn tragedy of the B52 bomber of the US air force which prematurely unleashed it's cargo of high-explosives on the same little town, turning it's center into a flattened mass of rubble under which many people lay dead. 'I saw one stick of bombs through the town but it was no great disaster,' Colonel Opfer, the American air attache, told a press conference. Opfer had not understood a thing. The bombing had killed or wounded some 400 people. One man lost twelve members of his family.
Now, if THAT was on your permanent record, how would YOU handle it? Lie, Cheat, Steal? What if you paid for the whole thing?
My parent's accountant was in the news today...
Apparently he like to eat babies. Yes, babies. This is only a little satirical - I donno - we'll see!
Miyamoto Mel & Associates
Categories:
444 N Larchmont Blvd Ste 208
Los Angeles, CA 90004 (323) 462-4845
March 31st, 2007
OMG they're doing the SAME thing in IRAQ they did to CAMBODIA! WOH!
You know, creating several factions that will fight each other to the death, screaming AL QUEDAH wtf and then hoping at the end to set of some version of a neutron bomb, so that in the end, you're little walk-man doesn't work and besides, you just shot at your neighbors so there will never be peace. Add METH to the mix, and forget about Cambodia, and guess what!
FUCK YOU VETENARIAN - i went to the other VETS OFFICE. THE REAL ONE. thank you!
11. Berenson, Sampson, and others in the Republican party had no meaningful information in their suitcases. This was a ruse designed to create the impression that they were well prepared. However, information from the weekend shows counsel was preparing to cover issues wholly unrelated to the hearing.
________
ACTUALLY, what the suitcase contained was tons and tons of execution letters implicating the CIA in brutal murders.
March 28th, 2007
March 27th, 2007
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Refugee
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Refugee
BUSH THIS, kodak wannabeez
"You can punch your way out of a wet paper bag with sissors in your hands."
Refugee =
A person who is seeking asylum in a foreign country in order to escape persecution, war, terrorism, extreme poverty, famines, and natural disaster. Some regional legal instruments further include those seeking to escape generalized violence in the definition of a refugee. Those who desire refugee status are sometimes known as asylum seekers and the practice of accepting such refugees is that of offering political asylum. The most common asylum claims to industrialized countries are based upon political and religious grounds. According to the 1951 United Nations Convention Relating to the Status of Refugees, a refugee is a person who
BUSH THIS, kodak wannabeez
"You can punch your way out of a wet paper bag with sissors in your hands."
Refugee =
A person who is seeking asylum in a foreign country in order to escape persecution, war, terrorism, extreme poverty, famines, and natural disaster. Some regional legal instruments further include those seeking to escape generalized violence in the definition of a refugee. Those who desire refugee status are sometimes known as asylum seekers and the practice of accepting such refugees is that of offering political asylum. The most common asylum claims to industrialized countries are based upon political and religious grounds. According to the 1951 United Nations Convention Relating to the Status of Refugees, a refugee is a person who
| “ | owing to a well-founded fear of being persecuted for reasons of race, religion, nationality, membership of a particular social group, or political opinion, is outside the country of their nationality, and is unable to or, owing to such fear, is unwilling to avail him/herself of the protection of that country. |
Survey: are you a cult leader?
I'm mostly too worried about my credit card account to think about going to JAIL.
I had better stop teaching at a jail because I now understand what mandatory reporting is.
You had to work at an underfunded Youth Center to really grasp the concept of 'mandatory reporting'.
You had to quit the youth center because of your school's 'checkered past' and being afraid of cameras.
I'm too lame of a teacher to believe in my own studets.
I am too lame of a dean to do the same
I make mistakes with Cris Ekstein.
I have no idea how to help the people I hurt, especially to give them freedom.
This last question is so important and a good way to separate wheat from Chaiff.
You only sometimes hurt the ones you love.
You feel regret.
You would like to offer care and concern for those around me.
A cult has crazy laws that are SO difficult to follow and besides every which way you turn someone rips you off, or a new asshole, or whatevah.
You would rather control a military than yourself.
After you successfully pass this quiz, you can write the essay questions, but if the Bush girls were here I might even let them take me to lunch. I kind think they're cute!
One time on my college trax, Chesea Clinton came to see "Smith" and maybe MH colleg? Not sure about tht one, but she at at one of my FAVORITE RESTAURAUTS in Noho. Noho is suspicously like nomo but why not make it her "Name-Sake" for her father?
Hmmm, would they preform for me, you know, lobester an' stuff. Look, you got Prince Harry twice, I need some real intelligence once, but times 3 is ok, too, you know.
I had better stop teaching at a jail because I now understand what mandatory reporting is.
You had to work at an underfunded Youth Center to really grasp the concept of 'mandatory reporting'.
You had to quit the youth center because of your school's 'checkered past' and being afraid of cameras.
I'm too lame of a teacher to believe in my own studets.
I am too lame of a dean to do the same
I make mistakes with Cris Ekstein.
I have no idea how to help the people I hurt, especially to give them freedom.
This last question is so important and a good way to separate wheat from Chaiff.
You only sometimes hurt the ones you love.
You feel regret.
You would like to offer care and concern for those around me.
A cult has crazy laws that are SO difficult to follow and besides every which way you turn someone rips you off, or a new asshole, or whatevah.
You would rather control a military than yourself.
After you successfully pass this quiz, you can write the essay questions, but if the Bush girls were here I might even let them take me to lunch. I kind think they're cute!
One time on my college trax, Chesea Clinton came to see "Smith" and maybe MH colleg? Not sure about tht one, but she at at one of my FAVORITE RESTAURAUTS in Noho. Noho is suspicously like nomo but why not make it her "Name-Sake" for her father?
Hmmm, would they preform for me, you know, lobester an' stuff. Look, you got Prince Harry twice, I need some real intelligence once, but times 3 is ok, too, you know.
March 26th, 2007
Olympics?
The Aussies had been to East Timor and they helped me figure out that a shadow has a bail.
March 25th, 2007
Will Smith - I don't think "Flavah Flav" quite just know how to play the movie "Amazon Women on the Moon in 3D" do you think you can help? Besides, my hands are kinda tied up right now....
Anyone have the REAL Garibaldi Story of Coke, etc?
And the State Flag?
THANK YOU!
Also: Special thank you for the guys at the COURT:
And the State Flag?
THANK YOU!
Also: Special thank you for the guys at the COURT: